-
Should the buy-sell
agreement apply to just current shareholders or to all new
shareholders during the life of the new or existing corporation?
-
There should be a
statement in the buy-sell agreement to the effect that it
supersedes all other existing agreements to redeem stock or
purchase stock executed by the shareholders.
-
Will the death of a
shareholder in the corporation result in an automatic buy-out of
his interest, or will the next of kin be allowed to become a
shareholder in the corporation?
-
Will all of the
death buy-out amount be funded by insurance, or just part of it?
In the event of a death buy-out, will all the proceeds from the
policy be used to redeem the stock of the deceased shareholder.
-
In the event of the
death of a shareholder, what will be the disposition of
shareholder receivables or payables?
-
What will be the
price paid to an employee shareholder who resigns or is fired from
the corporation?
-
In case an employee
shareholder resigns or is fired from the corporation, will a
covenant not to compete be involved, and if so, what will be its
geographic area (fifty miles, for example) and for how long will
it be in effect (for example, five years, or in conjunction with
the installment payments of the buy-out if not paid in cash)?
-
How many days should
the corporation have in which to pay off a terminated, disabled,
or deceased shareholder?
OBSERVATION
Certain arrangements, called either stock redemption or
cross-purchase agreements, assure the further continuance of the
corporation. These agreements may also give the corporation or
shareholders the right of first refusal should the stock become
available due to the death of a shareholder or because a
shareholder wishes to sell her stock.
EXAMPLE Mike Smith
and Jim Kelleher are equal shareholders in SMK Consulting, Inc. By
prior written agreement, if either individual dies, retires, or
becomes totally disabled, the other shareholder is required to
purchase the shares, thus becoming the sole shareholder. This is
an example of a cross- purchase agreement.
-
Disability buy-out
is a sensitive subject for employee shareholders to discuss.
However, a disabled corporate employee cannot be carried for very
long in a small business. Most businesses use a disability buy-out
period of between three and six months. In other words, if one of
the employee shareholders becomes totally disabled for a period of
three months, on the first day of the fourth month, the corporate
employee's stock is automatically sold back to the corporation at
a disability buy-out price.
-
The corporation
needs to discuss the possibility of one of the shareholders
finding a non related third party to buy his stock. Does the
corporation want shareholders to have the right to sell on the
open market to any third party or only have the right of first
refusal? Or does the corporation want to restrict rights and only
allow the shareholders to sell back to the corporation itself.
There is quite a danger in allowing for unrelated third parties to
make offers on stock of closely held corporations. Obviously a
competitor could make an offer, making it hard to tell if it was a
bona fide offer or just a ploy to drive the stock price up so that
the remaining shareholders would have to pay a higher price to
repurchase the stock.
-
All shareholders in
the corporation who sign buy-sell agreements should also have
their spouses, if any, sign the agreement as well. It is best to
do this at the attorney's office and have the signatures witnessed
or notarized. This prevents later problems in the event of a
marital dissolution.
-
Shareholders of a
corporation must decide whether or not the corporation will
guarantee obligations to a retiring or deceased shareholder. The
obligations should be personally guaranteed by the remaining
shareholders when a shareholder dies or retires because the
corporation could eventually become insolvent. Since one of the
most important functions of a corporation is to shield the
shareholders from personal liability, the personal guarantee, in
writing, of every shareholder would provide the best protection
against pending obligations.